Gamerscore HACKERS policy review

Re: Re: Gamerscore HACKERS policy review

03/24/10 5:10 pm | #46

Quote by CHASE1494:

some people do it for the fun i guess, seeing if they can do t without being caught like STALLION83!!!

dumb ass.

View Profile

Re: Re: Re: Gamerscore HACKERS policy review

03/24/10 11:46 pm | #47

Quote by Melissa Evol:

Quote by Nick:

I believe Stallion83's gamerscore is legit.... I.E. it is not hacked but EARNED....

however i do believe it is a confederation of united players who remain anonymous to boost Stallion's GS. I read somewhere that Stallion83 gets all kinds of sponorship now, maybe he is splitting his free swag with the "Stallion Confederation"

I agree. I listened to Stepto's podcast, and they do indeed say they reset people for tag sharing, and that it's easy to figure it out, but my guess is that it's easy to figure it out for them because most XBL people are stupid. They go on forums making threads for help beating games, or bragging about their friends doing crap for them, or they pay a service to complete games for them. If they don't talk about it ever, there's absolutely no way an xbox can differentiate between who is holding the controller. If there is a "Stallion Confederation" as long as they keep it to the same console, or use a memory card so there's not constant profile recovering, it's not going to be something that comes up as cheating.

I'm not sure how I feel about people being reset for sharing... There are times when I'll play games for Evol or vice versa- not because I'm like "Oh DOOD, I want to get to 64k, beat these games for me!" but because he and I have certain tastes in games, and we enjoy playing them, but playing through again once you have all the achievements isn't fun. I loved two worlds, I jumped at the chance to play through it again for him. He loves Hexic... not only did he get us both 200, but he has other gold and silver accounts that have the game completed as well! It's just MORE FUN to play for achievements! We're also not going around telling people we beat the games or using it for personal gain though (aka: sponsorship). I just don't feel it violates the terms of service in any way. Maybe the SPIRIT of the 360, but not actually the rules. The games are being played, regardless of who plays them.

@AJ, his gamertag is in the guinness book, and if he's going to be mentioned at all, it will be as the owner of the tag. The GAMERTAG legitimately earned the gamerscore- that doesn't mean only one person was playing the whole time. People get to the top, get obsessed and will do anything to stay there- look at StripclubDJ. There's a guy who got to the top just to fall HARD.

So if you think Stallion is a confederation of players.. Then is LOWlifeSpIdEr a confederation of players too? Since you claimed to have beat Hel for EVOL in Viking, then who do you consider legit; someone with what type of gamerscore? If Stallion isn't legit, then is the second place? Third place? Fourth? How far will it go? Has anyone who broke 100k done it legit or has it been more than 1 person?

View Profile

Re: Re: Re: Re: Gamerscore HACKERS policy review

03/24/10 11:54 pm | #48

Quote by AJ:

Quote by Melissa Evol:

I agree. I listened to Stepto's podcast, and they do indeed say they reset people for tag sharing, and that it's easy to figure it out, but my guess is that it's easy to figure it out for them because most XBL people are stupid. They go on forums making threads for help beating games, or bragging about their friends doing crap for them, or they pay a service to complete games for them. If they don't talk about it ever, there's absolutely no way an xbox can differentiate between who is holding the controller. If there is a "Stallion Confederation" as long as they keep it to the same console, or use a memory card so there's not constant profile recovering, it's not going to be something that comes up as cheating.

I'm not sure how I feel about people being reset for sharing... There are times when I'll play games for Evol or vice versa- not because I'm like "Oh DOOD, I want to get to 64k, beat these games for me!" but because he and I have certain tastes in games, and we enjoy playing them, but playing through again once you have all the achievements isn't fun. I loved two worlds, I jumped at the chance to play through it again for him. He loves Hexic... not only did he get us both 200, but he has other gold and silver accounts that have the game completed as well! It's just MORE FUN to play for achievements! We're also not going around telling people we beat the games or using it for personal gain though (aka: sponsorship). I just don't feel it violates the terms of service in any way. Maybe the SPIRIT of the 360, but not actually the rules. The games are being played, regardless of who plays them.

@AJ, his gamertag is in the guinness book, and if he's going to be mentioned at all, it will be as the owner of the tag. The GAMERTAG legitimately earned the gamerscore- that doesn't mean only one person was playing the whole time. People get to the top, get obsessed and will do anything to stay there- look at StripclubDJ. There's a guy who got to the top just to fall HARD.

So if you think Stallion is a confederation of players.. Then is LOWlifeSpIdEr a confederation of players too? Since you claimed to have beat Hel for EVOL in Viking, then who do you consider legit; someone with what type of gamerscore? If Stallion isn't legit, then is the second place? Third place? Fourth? How far will it go? Has anyone who broke 100k done it legit or has it been more than 1 person?

when i break 100k i will be legit. NO ONE has EVER logged into my account but meeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

View Profile

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Gamerscore HACKERS policy review

03/24/10 11:56 pm | #49

Quote by Nick:

Quote by AJ:

So if you think Stallion is a confederation of players.. Then is LOWlifeSpIdEr a confederation of players too? Since you claimed to have beat Hel for EVOL in Viking, then who do you consider legit; someone with what type of gamerscore? If Stallion isn't legit, then is the second place? Third place? Fourth? How far will it go? Has anyone who broke 100k done it legit or has it been more than 1 person?

when i break 100k i will be legit. NO ONE has EVER logged into my account but meeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

What about Lauren? I know she's gotten a cheeve here and there.... Idc if you say no, she has.

View Profile

Re: Re: Re: Re: Gamerscore HACKERS policy review

03/25/10 12:02 am | #50

Quote by AJ:

Quote by Melissa Evol:

I agree. I listened to Stepto's podcast, and they do indeed say they reset people for tag sharing, and that it's easy to figure it out, but my guess is that it's easy to figure it out for them because most XBL people are stupid. They go on forums making threads for help beating games, or bragging about their friends doing crap for them, or they pay a service to complete games for them. If they don't talk about it ever, there's absolutely no way an xbox can differentiate between who is holding the controller. If there is a "Stallion Confederation" as long as they keep it to the same console, or use a memory card so there's not constant profile recovering, it's not going to be something that comes up as cheating.

I'm not sure how I feel about people being reset for sharing... There are times when I'll play games for Evol or vice versa- not because I'm like "Oh DOOD, I want to get to 64k, beat these games for me!" but because he and I have certain tastes in games, and we enjoy playing them, but playing through again once you have all the achievements isn't fun. I loved two worlds, I jumped at the chance to play through it again for him. He loves Hexic... not only did he get us both 200, but he has other gold and silver accounts that have the game completed as well! It's just MORE FUN to play for achievements! We're also not going around telling people we beat the games or using it for personal gain though (aka: sponsorship). I just don't feel it violates the terms of service in any way. Maybe the SPIRIT of the 360, but not actually the rules. The games are being played, regardless of who plays them.

@AJ, his gamertag is in the guinness book, and if he's going to be mentioned at all, it will be as the owner of the tag. The GAMERTAG legitimately earned the gamerscore- that doesn't mean only one person was playing the whole time. People get to the top, get obsessed and will do anything to stay there- look at StripclubDJ. There's a guy who got to the top just to fall HARD.

So if you think Stallion is a confederation of players.. Then is LOWlifeSpIdEr a confederation of players too? Since you claimed to have beat Hel for EVOL in Viking, then who do you consider legit; someone with what type of gamerscore? If Stallion isn't legit, then is the second place? Third place? Fourth? How far will it go? Has anyone who broke 100k done it legit or has it been more than 1 person?

when i break 100k i will be legit. NO ONE has EVER logged into my account but meeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

View Profile

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Gamerscore HACKERS policy review

03/25/10 12:03 am | #51

Quote by Nick:

Quote by AJ:

So if you think Stallion is a confederation of players.. Then is LOWlifeSpIdEr a confederation of players too? Since you claimed to have beat Hel for EVOL in Viking, then who do you consider legit; someone with what type of gamerscore? If Stallion isn't legit, then is the second place? Third place? Fourth? How far will it go? Has anyone who broke 100k done it legit or has it been more than 1 person?

when i break 100k i will be legit. NO ONE has EVER logged into my account but meeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

You fail.

View Profile

Re: Gamerscore HACKERS policy review

03/25/10 12:05 am | #52

One of my roommates got 3 Achievements in Turtles in Time on my GT. I guess I'll turn myself in

View Profile

Re: Re: Gamerscore HACKERS policy review

03/25/10 12:08 am | #53

Quote by Meta:

One of my roommates got 3 Achievements in Turtles in Time on my GT. I guess I'll turn myself in

Well sorry, Meta. You're gonna be reset soon! :baffled:

View Profile

12/31/69 7:00 pm | #54

Deleted User

View Profile

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Gamerscore HACKERS policy review

03/25/10 12:14 am | #55

Quote by Melissa Evol:

Quote by AJ:

So if you think Stallion is a confederation of players.. Then is LOWlifeSpIdEr a confederation of players too? Since you claimed to have beat Hel for EVOL in Viking, then who do you consider legit; someone with what type of gamerscore? If Stallion isn't legit, then is the second place? Third place? Fourth? How far will it go? Has anyone who broke 100k done it legit or has it been more than 1 person?

lol wut? I didn't beat Hel for Evol, he beat it before I even lived here. I beat it for me. You couldn't pay me to do that shit again!

Yes, I think Stallion is a confederation of players. Lowlife plays quite a bit and has 1/2 the gamerscore that Stallion has- how is that comparable? As high as Spider's GS is, he needs to take breaks from gaming and do other things. And since Stallion has repeatedly said in interviews that he has a life- he goes to school, he watches sports, he has a GF... there's no way the guy could put the hours into a tag like he has while still having a life.

I never said his SCORE wasn't legit. I said he misrepresents himself, which of course he does- he's getting kickbacks, and made famous by his score. Not ALL of his points are legit- for instance he used the trick of changing his timezone for his 3 copies of Brothers in Arms Hell's Highway. He played those games 9 days each and has the 100 days achievement. He got the "play on September 17th" achievement on the 16th- by changing his time settings. He's not 100% legit either, but no one is calling him a cheater, because there are certain things that gamers do- exploits, glitches, etc... to get around boring as hell achievements. I don't know about his imported games- if he's fluent in 4 different languages or if the imports have English as an option, but I've played Japanese demos, and even when it's a game I know (like the JP demo of Eternal Sonata) the language barrier makes playing nearly impossible, much less 1king it.

As far as asking how far it will go- there are people who make the argument that people who boost aren't legit either- and in a very literal sense, they aren't. But then they also aren't going around doing interviews about being legit, and aren't getting their gamertag listed as the highest LEGIT score.

I honestly don't think there are too many gamers who have never had help with any game on their profile, either through boosting or having someone else do something for them. I never said anything about that. All I said was that while his SCORE may be legit, Stallion himself is most likely not. And the only problem I have with that is the dishonestly behind it.

You still never answered my question... If he ISN'T legit; then who is? Is anyone with over 300,000 legit?

View Profile

Re: Re: Re: Re: Gamerscore HACKERS policy review

03/25/10 12:15 am | #56

Quote by AJ:

Quote by Melissa Evol:

I agree. I listened to Stepto's podcast, and they do indeed say they reset people for tag sharing, and that it's easy to figure it out, but my guess is that it's easy to figure it out for them because most XBL people are stupid. They go on forums making threads for help beating games, or bragging about their friends doing crap for them, or they pay a service to complete games for them. If they don't talk about it ever, there's absolutely no way an xbox can differentiate between who is holding the controller. If there is a "Stallion Confederation" as long as they keep it to the same console, or use a memory card so there's not constant profile recovering, it's not going to be something that comes up as cheating.

I'm not sure how I feel about people being reset for sharing... There are times when I'll play games for Evol or vice versa- not because I'm like "Oh DOOD, I want to get to 64k, beat these games for me!" but because he and I have certain tastes in games, and we enjoy playing them, but playing through again once you have all the achievements isn't fun. I loved two worlds, I jumped at the chance to play through it again for him. He loves Hexic... not only did he get us both 200, but he has other gold and silver accounts that have the game completed as well! It's just MORE FUN to play for achievements! We're also not going around telling people we beat the games or using it for personal gain though (aka: sponsorship). I just don't feel it violates the terms of service in any way. Maybe the SPIRIT of the 360, but not actually the rules. The games are being played, regardless of who plays them.

@AJ, his gamertag is in the guinness book, and if he's going to be mentioned at all, it will be as the owner of the tag. The GAMERTAG legitimately earned the gamerscore- that doesn't mean only one person was playing the whole time. People get to the top, get obsessed and will do anything to stay there- look at StripclubDJ. There's a guy who got to the top just to fall HARD.

So if you think Stallion is a confederation of players.. Then is LOWlifeSpIdEr a confederation of players too? Since you claimed to have beat Hel for EVOL in Viking, then who do you consider legit; someone with what type of gamerscore? If Stallion isn't legit, then is the second place? Third place? Fourth? How far will it go? Has anyone who broke 100k done it legit or has it been more than 1 person?

when i break 100k i will be legit. NO ONE has EVER logged into my account but meeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

View Profile

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Gamerscore HACKERS policy review

03/25/10 12:17 am | #57

Quote by Nick:

Quote by AJ:

So if you think Stallion is a confederation of players.. Then is LOWlifeSpIdEr a confederation of players too? Since you claimed to have beat Hel for EVOL in Viking, then who do you consider legit; someone with what type of gamerscore? If Stallion isn't legit, then is the second place? Third place? Fourth? How far will it go? Has anyone who broke 100k done it legit or has it been more than 1 person?

when i break 100k i will be legit. NO ONE has EVER logged into my account but meeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

You're blocked now.

View Profile

12/31/69 7:00 pm | #58

Deleted User

View Profile

Re: Re: Re: Re: Gamerscore HACKERS policy review

03/25/10 12:19 am | #59

Quote by AJ:

Quote by Melissa Evol:

I agree. I listened to Stepto's podcast, and they do indeed say they reset people for tag sharing, and that it's easy to figure it out, but my guess is that it's easy to figure it out for them because most XBL people are stupid. They go on forums making threads for help beating games, or bragging about their friends doing crap for them, or they pay a service to complete games for them. If they don't talk about it ever, there's absolutely no way an xbox can differentiate between who is holding the controller. If there is a "Stallion Confederation" as long as they keep it to the same console, or use a memory card so there's not constant profile recovering, it's not going to be something that comes up as cheating.

I'm not sure how I feel about people being reset for sharing... There are times when I'll play games for Evol or vice versa- not because I'm like "Oh DOOD, I want to get to 64k, beat these games for me!" but because he and I have certain tastes in games, and we enjoy playing them, but playing through again once you have all the achievements isn't fun. I loved two worlds, I jumped at the chance to play through it again for him. He loves Hexic... not only did he get us both 200, but he has other gold and silver accounts that have the game completed as well! It's just MORE FUN to play for achievements! We're also not going around telling people we beat the games or using it for personal gain though (aka: sponsorship). I just don't feel it violates the terms of service in any way. Maybe the SPIRIT of the 360, but not actually the rules. The games are being played, regardless of who plays them.

@AJ, his gamertag is in the guinness book, and if he's going to be mentioned at all, it will be as the owner of the tag. The GAMERTAG legitimately earned the gamerscore- that doesn't mean only one person was playing the whole time. People get to the top, get obsessed and will do anything to stay there- look at StripclubDJ. There's a guy who got to the top just to fall HARD.

So if you think Stallion is a confederation of players.. Then is LOWlifeSpIdEr a confederation of players too? Since you claimed to have beat Hel for EVOL in Viking, then who do you consider legit; someone with what type of gamerscore? If Stallion isn't legit, then is the second place? Third place? Fourth? How far will it go? Has anyone who broke 100k done it legit or has it been more than 1 person?

when i break 100k i will be legit. NO ONE has EVER logged into my account but meeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

View Profile

12/31/69 7:00 pm | #60

Deleted User

View Profile

Options: Archived: Gamerscore HACKERS policy review

Options:

Archived: Gamerscore HACKERS policy review