Quote by angrymoo:
LOL this made me chuckle.
also it seems like no one in this thread has the conviction to out argue Melissa. Her opinion is the law in this thread!
Well, I have sort of argued with her on this issue before, but the thing is, I mostly agree with her. So do a lot of others.
Personally, I don't like the idea of some outside entity making decisions for me, but at the same time, I don't see any reason NOT to keep shit out of kids' hands, and saying it has to do with preventing them to being exposed to "certain ideas" is fucking retarded.
This has nothing to do with stifling ideas or expression and everything to do with not letting non-parented kids sit around with insanely violent interactive entertainment and have their little minds desensitized.
I also agree that BOTH sides of this case have handled it poorly, and at this point I am kind of fed up with the whole thing, which was why I didn't bother to weigh in until now.
To me, it is as simple as what she said earlier: I wouldn't want my kid of say 11 years old to be able to go behind my back and lay $60 on a counter and buy an M rated game with graphic violence. If it takes a shitty federal mandate to do that, then oh well, it becomes a necessary evil at that point.