Quote by CaptainMayhem88:
Long story short both parties are trying to get the women vote....just because mainly they'll end up saying oh look a women well if she supports so and so maybe we'll have a good chance of turning things around. Obama did it by getting Clintons support McCain did one better by naming his VP a women, the thing is though voters are so uninformed that they don't know whether or not who they vote for are actually able to run a country so we could end up having another Bush era all over again. (not saying the canidates are like Bush just using an example) Myself I don't think Palin would make a good VP as she's publicly stated she had no idea what the VP does when she was asked to be McCains running mate then again I stand against McCain for wanting to continue the war. I also stand against Obama as everytime he speaks publicly he names off so many things that he'll "fix" in this country that I almost have a feeling that he has too big a ego to run the U.S.A., I also feel his wife is a stuck up bitch who feels better than everyone who isn't her. Well that's my 2 cents.
actually, my moms friend and i were talking about this..
pail was governor of alaska. which means, she has some authority in the drilling of the oil there..and she was all for it...but as a governor she doesnt get the biggest say in it..and conservatorists or whatever stopped her..
so now, if mccain is prez, they can drill for oil in alaska..no matter how much they can affect (people, animals, the state itself, even canda and the pacific ocean!)
