Welcome!
Sign up to remove the advertisements.
Archived: College Football Talk
(Page 35 out of 42):
« First, …
31,
32,
33,
34,
35,
36,
37,
38,
39,
…
Last »
Re: Re: Re: College Football Talk
01/03/13 11:03 pm | #511
Quote by theEVOL1:
Quote by Circus:
Kansas State has about a boring offense, they haven't had a completion that was thrown for over 5 yards before the run after the catch and Oregon's offense looks like crap.
As soon as you say that, you'll look up and somehow they put up 50.
And it DID happen lmao Oregon went off all of a sudden, K State looks like a joke.
Re: College Football Talk
01/04/13 9:23 am | #512
Oregon 35, Cinderella Kansas State 17... This is no doubt the SAME Futility U that was shut out of the bcs bowls during the early years of the Bogus College System just because it's Kansas State!
As for NIU...
Re: College Football Talk
01/05/13 12:33 am | #513
Manziel looked good tonight, but I'm sick of scrambling QBs in college, they don't succeed in the NFL, plain and simple, he needs to work on his pocket passing in the next 2 years unless he wants to be another bench warming Tebow
Re: Re: College Football Talk
01/05/13 12:47 am | #514
Quote by Circus:
Manziel looked good tonight, but I'm sick of scrambling QBs in college, they don't succeed in the NFL, plain and simple, he needs to work on his pocket passing in the next 2 years unless he wants to be another bench warming Tebow
He's still a better passer than Tebow.
Re: Re: College Football Talk
01/05/13 3:13 am | #515
Quote by Circus:
Manziel looked good tonight, but I'm sick of scrambling QBs in college, they don't succeed in the NFL, plain and simple, he needs to work on his pocket passing in the next 2 years unless he wants to be another bench warming Tebow
steve young was pretty good no?
Re: Re: Re: College Football Talk
01/05/13 4:25 am | #516
Quote by The Snapple Cap:
Quote by Circus:
Manziel looked good tonight, but I'm sick of scrambling QBs in college, they don't succeed in the NFL, plain and simple, he needs to work on his pocket passing in the next 2 years unless he wants to be another bench warming Tebow
steve young was pretty good no?
I'm talking about today's NFL asshat, scrambling QBs don't last anymore and if they do they don't win any Super Bowls (McNabb, Vick, etc.)
Re: College Football Talk
01/06/13 11:08 pm | #517
Alabama is reduced to the role of spoiler in their bowl game just as they were a year ago at this time: if they beat Notre Dame then Ohio State will be all alone at the top. If Alabama loses to Notre Dame then Notre Dame and Ohio State will be forced to share something that ought to be decided on the field.
What is so seriously ludicrously unbelievably wrong with poor "Lousybama" anyway? Getting stuck in the Fake Title Bowl with one loss too many and less than no hope of a national title two years in a row? Preposterous!
Re: Re: College Football Talk
01/07/13 12:07 am | #518
Quote by Zyzzy75:
Alabama is reduced to the role of spoiler in their bowl game just as they were a year ago at this time: if they beat Notre Dame then Ohio State will be all alone at the top. If Alabama loses to Notre Dame then Notre Dame and Ohio State will be forced to share something that ought to be decided on the field.
What is so seriously ludicrously unbelievably wrong with poor "Lousybama" anyway? Getting stuck in the Fake Title Bowl with one loss too many and less than no hope of a national title two years in a row? Preposterous!
What? You are aware that OSU being 'alone at the top' means absolutely nothing since they're not eligible for anything right? And how is Alabama anything lousy when they've won 2 national championships with a shot at a 3rd in the last 4 years?
Notre Dame hasn't been relevant in 20 years
Re: Re: College Football Talk
01/07/13 12:32 am | #519
Quote by Zyzzy75:
Alabama is reduced to the role of spoiler in their bowl game just as they were a year ago at this time: if they beat Notre Dame then Ohio State will be all alone at the top. If Alabama loses to Notre Dame then Notre Dame and Ohio State will be forced to share something that ought to be decided on the field.
What is so seriously ludicrously unbelievably wrong with poor "Lousybama" anyway? Getting stuck in the Fake Title Bowl with one loss too many and less than no hope of a national title two years in a row? Preposterous!
Re: Re: College Football Talk
01/07/13 1:18 am | #520
Quote by Zyzzy75:
Alabama is reduced to the role of spoiler in their bowl game just as they were a year ago at this time: if they beat Notre Dame then Ohio State will be all alone at the top. If Alabama loses to Notre Dame then Notre Dame and Ohio State will be forced to share something that ought to be decided on the field.
What is so seriously ludicrously unbelievably wrong with poor "Lousybama" anyway? Getting stuck in the Fake Title Bowl with one loss too many and less than no hope of a national title two years in a row? Preposterous!
they wouldn't be sharing anything considering OSU is bowl ineligible so it really doesn't matter what there record was.
Re: College Football Talk
01/07/13 10:11 am | #521
Quote by Circus:
What? You are aware that OSU being 'alone at the top' means absolutely nothing since they're not eligible for anything right? And how is Alabama anything lousy when they've won 2 national championships with a shot at a 3rd in the last 4 years?
Since unbeaten Ohio State's season is already over, bowl-eligible or not, a loss by Notre Dame WOULD leave Ohio State alone at the top. On the other hand, Alabama was proven on the field to be no better than third in the nation!
Three years ago at this time, FIVE unbeaten teams (TCU, Texas, Alabama, Boise State, Cincinnati) were cheated out of an undisputed national title by an uncaring Bogus College System: Alabama beat Texas and Boise State beat TCU, but Boise State and Alabama were forced to share since they didn't get to play each other for all the marbles, and only a win once-beaten also-ran Florida over snake-beaten odd-unbeaten-out Cincinnati averted a possible three-way split. What a giant economy-sized traveshamockery!
Re: College Football Talk
01/07/13 11:43 am | #522
I don't even think half of those are words.
SMOKE POLE TIDE!!!
Re: College Football Talk
01/07/13 1:33 pm | #523
Boise state had a cupcake schedule last year, not every team that goes undefeated deserves being in the national title picture. that's not how it works.
who's everyone got for tonight? I think notre dame is gonna win but nick sabin and the roll tide have been to game so many times so often it'll be close
Re: College Football Talk
01/07/13 2:52 pm | #524
Quote by Evol:
I don't even think half of those are words.
SMOKE POLE TIDE!!!
QFT.
I'm not one of these rabid Notre Dame hating Buckeye fans so I'm kinda pulling for them simply because they're the underdog and I'm sick and fucking tired of seeing Alabama in it every year.
Re: College Football Talk
01/08/13 3:17 am | #525
Notre Dame sure didn't look like an overrated joke tonight
(Page 35 out of 42):
« First, …
31,
32,
33,
34,
35,
36,
37,
38,
39,
…
Last »