Welcome! Sign up to remove the advertisements.

Options:

Archived: 2010 NBA Playoffs

Posted Under: Entertainment

(Page 3 out of 12): 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, … Last »

Re: Re: 2010 NBA Playoffs

05/08/10 10:58 am | #31

Quote by Tupac9671:

boston is gonna kill the cavs they dont even have a suad just one man and it takes a team to win. boston has a team we are going to school the cavs and to the person that said the ceiltics are washed up what game you watching there not even close to washed up you must be blind

Cavs 124 Celtics 95
When is this killing you speak of?

Re: Re: 2010 NBA Playoffs

05/08/10 12:18 pm | #32

Quote by Tupac9671:

boston is gonna kill the cavs they dont even have a suad just one man and it takes a team to win. boston has a team we are going to school the cavs and to the person that said the ceiltics are washed up what game you watching there not even close to washed up you must be blind

Oh, I love this! There's nothing I love more than some ignorant DB saying the Cavs are a one man team.

Ok how many Cavs were in double figures last night? Go ahead, look it up.

Who is blind here? Obviously you only saw what you wanted to see. While the "big three" were out getting their depends changed, there was a basketball game going on. I say they are washed up because of what they looked like in the home stretch of the season. I call them washed up because while the Cavs clawed and scratched their way back in a blowout in game 2, the Celtics folded faster than Superman doing laundry as soon as they got behind in game 3. They're washed up because they lost the edge.

Let Rondo take all your shots and see the Cavs win by 50. It's Boston that looked like the one man team last night. Come with a better argument or at least TRY to support you weak ass one with facts!

Re: 2010 NBA Playoffs

05/08/10 2:12 pm | #33

What are you talking about Evol? The Cavs suck when James is hurt.

I can't wait to see how they do when his elbow is better :rofl:

:rofl:

Re: 2010 NBA Playoffs

05/08/10 2:17 pm | #34

come on who else the cavs got besides james no one. just because the celtics had a bad game doesnt make them a bad team. i guess you guys dont know much about basketball. it takes a team to win if the celtics were washed up they wont be in the playoffs in the first place. when you have something real to say then say just saying the cavs are gonna win and the celtics suck doesnt mean shit. look at the celtics stats then look at the cavs

Re: Re: 2010 NBA Playoffs

05/08/10 2:54 pm | #35

Quote by Tupac9671:

come on who else the cavs got besides james no one. just because the celtics had a bad game doesnt make them a bad team. i guess you guys dont know much about basketball. it takes a team to win if the celtics were washed up they wont be in the playoffs in the first place. when you have something real to say then say just saying the cavs are gonna win and the celtics suck doesnt mean shit. look at the celtics stats then look at the cavs

Are you serious, dude?? I never said the Celtics didn't deserve to make the playoffs. You are the one who came in here saying the Celtics are going to "kill" the Cavs with nothing to back it up. The thing is, even if Cleveland IS a one man team, that one man outscored your "suad" in the first quarter by himself. What stats do you want me to look up?

I'm laughing out loud that you write this nonsensical drivel while drooling out some bullshit about anyone else not knowing much about basketball. Do you realize that every fan boy out there thinks there team is "deep" simply because they are able to name every player on their team? That doesn't mean that their team is deep. I can name off every Cavalier right now to let you know there are 14 players other than LBJ, but why would I have to?

In the end, the Cavs best player is better than Boston's best. The Cavs bench is deeper than the Celtics. Cleveland has people on their bench that aren't getting minutes in the playoffs that would challenge for starting jobs on other teams. If it weren't for Delonte West and Boston's magical dissapearing defense, the Cavs might have lost game 1.

For a 1 man team, the Cavaliers sure have a lot of all star appearances.

12/31/69 7:00 pm | #36

Deleted User

Delete Post

Re: Re: Re: 2010 NBA Playoffs

05/08/10 3:59 pm | #37

Quote by theEVOL1:

While the "big three" were out getting their depends changed, there was a basketball game going on.

Do you think they get a discount on their sneakers if they use their AARP cards? :laugh:

:laugh:

Game two was just the wake-up call the Cavs needed. Sore elbow or no sore elbow, LeBron still made Peirce look old last night and where was Rondo?

Re: Re: Re: 2010 NBA Playoffs

05/08/10 4:27 pm | #38

Quote by theEVOL1:

Cleveland has people on their bench that aren't getting minutes in the playoffs that would challenge for starting jobs on other teams.

While I agree with most everything you've said here about the Cavs (despite the fact that I dislike them) that part made me laugh...of course they would challenge for starting jobs on other teams, they're challenging for a starting job on their team...just losing the challenge

Most playoff teams can say that same thing...as long as you mean that their bench would challenge for a starting spot on a non-playoff team.

As for Cleveland's bench...who do you put as a starter on a decent team? Varejao...I'll give you that though I'm not a Varejao fan, West...a little stretch, the rest...they'll need to tryout for the Kings.

I'm an obvious Laker fan and think it's the same thing for the Lakers with the exception of Odom who would start for most any team IMO. Just taking a backseat to Artest right now. Shannon Brown...a little stretch, and the rest of the bench belongs on the bench....or shooting for a starting spot on the Kings or the Nets...I could start for the Nets

Re: Re: Re: Re: 2010 NBA Playoffs

05/08/10 7:27 pm | #39

Quote by Kent K25:

While I agree with most everything you've said here about the Cavs (despite the fact that I dislike them) that part made me laugh...of course they would challenge for starting jobs on other teams, they're challenging for a starting job on their team...just losing the challenge

Most playoff teams can say that same thing...as long as you mean that their bench would challenge for a starting spot on a non-playoff team.

As for Cleveland's bench...who do you put as a starter on a decent team? Varejao...I'll give you that though I'm not a Varejao fan, West...a little stretch, the rest...they'll need to tryout for the Kings.

I'm an obvious Laker fan and think it's the same thing for the Lakers with the exception of Odom who would start for most any team IMO. Just taking a backseat to Artest right now. Shannon Brown...a little stretch, and the rest of the bench belongs on the bench....or shooting for a starting spot on the Kings or the Nets...I could start for the Nets

I'll try out for the Nets if you do!

Yes Varejao would contest, (by challenge, I meant offer a serious challenge!

) but he's a little too "in between" as far as what position he plays. I think if West was given starter minutes he could be all-star caliber. The thing is that the NBA is becoming increasingly point guard strong, so West has missed his window, but he seems to be the most consistent Cav this year not named LeBron. Ilgauskas could play, but he's about done.

As far as Odom is concerned, yes, technically he's a "sixth man," but I don't really believe in Artest as a starter. That's just me.

All I was trying to prove is that saying the Cavs are a one man team is absurd along with saying LeBron can't shoot jump shots! It's not 2006 anymore! lol

Re: 2010 NBA Playoffs

05/09/10 12:06 am | #40

I agree with all of it.

Apparently I need to see more of West too. I just remember him on the Celtics as a bit of a head case. Seemed like if he got off to a good start he would be fine, but miss a shot or two, or turn the ball over and he was in trouble the rest of the game.

As for Artest vs. Odom....I still wish we had kept Ariza....

Re: 2010 NBA Playoffs

05/09/10 2:51 pm | #41

I tell you man the Cavs do not have the depth(or coaching) to compete with the Magic. The Celtics aren't done yet, but i'd be shocked if they stopped watching Matlock reruns and actually played a whole game. They aren't the mighty team they were in 2008, they're missing that bench that allowed the starters to get quality breathers, oh you might remember one of them Leon Powe who nows gives those breathers to the Cavs instead

. I'd love to see a Laker Cav final, but I'm not convinced that they'll beat the Magic yet, I know that one of their heroes last year in Hedo Turkoglu moved on to richer pastures, but Jameer Nelson is playing like he did before he fucked his shoulder up, and lets not forget the 3 point snipers they have both on the floor and on the bench, if Cleveland is to prove they're more than Lebron and those other guys, they need to win this series.

I agree that Boston's sun has set they already won 14 championships or something like that, but people get old and unfortunately the Celtics are starting 3 of them.

Re: 2010 NBA Playoffs

05/09/10 5:06 pm | #42

It figures... I give Delonte West some praise and he can't hit a shot to save his life! The Cavs are shooting 37% and forgot to play D. this team's going to make me tear out my hair! Here's to the second half!

Re: 2010 NBA Playoffs

05/09/10 10:34 pm | #43

I tell you man Rondo is going to be an elite PG for years to come, heres to 4 triple doubles in playoff games already. *salutes*

12/31/69 7:00 pm | #44

Deleted User

Delete Post

12/31/69 7:00 pm | #45

Deleted User

Delete Post

(Page 3 out of 12): 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, … Last »

3 12412

This thread has been archived. When a thread has been inactive for an extended period of time, it becomes "archived." These threads may be viewed but may not receive new posts. If you have something to post relevant to the topic, try searching for a more recent thread or create a new thread.