Welcome! Sign up to remove the advertisements.

Options:

Archived: Fantasy Sports

Posted Under: Off-Topic

(Page 2 out of 3): 1, 2, 3

Re: Fantasy Sports

08/12/06 3:20 am | #16

Quote by alzapa:

well just to talk about fantasy football, what do you guys think about Reggie Bush for a secont pick RB? I think he will do better than the RB that the saints have now. so I think Reggie Bush is the most over looked player this year.

I will be picking him at around round 7

do not pick him the first couple rounds.. i dont think anyone has him in any of the leagues i am in.. ur much safer with the big name rb's

Re: Fantasy Sports

08/12/06 7:07 am | #17

Quote by alzapa:

well just to talk about fantasy football, what do you guys think about Reggie Bush for a secont pick RB? I think he will do better than the RB that the saints have now. so I think Reggie Bush is the most over looked player this year.

I will be picking him at around round 7

I think Reggie "Bust" will be a flop in the NFL as a RB. I would not waste a pick on him simply because he WILL be splitting carries with Deuce McAllister.

Best to use you second on a guy that you know will be the main fpcus of his offense......

Z

Re: Fantasy Sports

08/12/06 10:37 am | #18

ya, well if I have first or secont pick I will get larry johnson or shaun alexander Than I am hopping to pick my second RB around the end of the draft and pick some one that has not has his chance to shine yet (Chester Taylor, Reggie Bush) but if I get 3-12th pick I will not try for Taylor or Bush.

Its a risk and not a smart thing to do, but every year there are people that are surprise stars and I hope they are one of them :D

Re: Fantasy Sports

08/12/06 4:49 pm | #19

How can only three people on a site with 143 members want to play fantasy football?!?!??

Re: Fantasy Sports

08/12/06 5:00 pm | #20

Quote by ukfan1444:

How can only three people on a site with 143 members want to play fantasy football?!?!??

Well because about 130 of those members are inactive :/.

Re: Fantasy Sports

08/12/06 5:17 pm | #21

Quote by Pastafarianism:

Well because about 130 of those members are inactive :/.

How come you're not playing, Pasta?

Re: Fantasy Sports

08/12/06 5:33 pm | #22

Quote by ukfan1444:

How come you're not playing, Pasta?

No thanks the only professional sports I follow are the Cavs.

Re: Fantasy Sports

08/12/06 11:22 pm | #23

Quote by alzapa:

ya, well if I have first or secont pick I will get larry johnson or shaun alexander .....

Be careful what you wish for. Tradition has shown that those that get fat pay days (Alexander) and those that lose their All Pro LT to retirment (Roaf) and RT to Free Agency tend to not produce at the same level. Throw in the new coaching staff......and LJ may become just a good player, and not the great player he was last season.

If you dont believe me, check out the performance in the weeks when Roaf and Gonzalez were out....

Z

Re: Fantasy Sports

08/13/06 12:32 am | #24

alexander wont slow down yet but i agree about LT

Re: Fantasy Sports

08/13/06 10:54 am | #25

He wasn't talking about LT. He was talking about LJ (Larry Johnson).

Re: Fantasy Sports

08/13/06 11:27 am | #26

Quote by ukfan1444:

He wasn't talking about LT. He was talking about LJ (Larry Johnson).

I was talking about Alexander (signing the big contract and maybe not having that incentive that he had last year) and LJ (for losing 2/5th of his starting OL including teh Pro-Bowl LT and coching change).

Z

Re: Fantasy Sports

08/13/06 12:58 pm | #27

My bad, I guess I got caught up in all the initials too.

Re: Fantasy Sports

08/13/06 3:42 pm | #28

Quote by ukfan1444:

My bad, I guess I got caught up in all the initials too.

no, i did too.. forgot about lj

Re: Fantasy Sports

08/14/06 1:26 pm | #29

well my draft was today and I had pick five and still got shaun alexander!!! also got #1 DEF Chicago

Re: Fantasy Sports

08/14/06 4:15 pm | #30

good job zapa

(Page 2 out of 3): 1, 2, 3

2 282

This thread has been archived. When a thread has been inactive for an extended period of time, it becomes "archived." These threads may be viewed but may not receive new posts. If you have something to post relevant to the topic, try searching for a more recent thread or create a new thread.