Archived: June 2010 Partner Gamerscore Competition Sign Up
Posted Under: Tournament Discussion
(Page 7 out of 13): « First, … 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, … Last »
Re: June 2010 Partner Gamerscore Competition Sign Up
05/27/10 8:44 pm | #91
Why no PC games?
Re: Re: June 2010 Partner Gamerscore Competition Sign Up
05/27/10 8:47 pm | #93
Quote by mikemnsn:
Why no PC games?
Yeah I'd like to know as well. I do play some PC games as well and I don't want kicked out just because I play one....
I mean what about not counting the GS from them if you have some severe problem with them?
Re: June 2010 Partner Gamerscore Competition Sign Up
05/27/10 8:52 pm | #95
If that's the logic then is Avatar and the 2k6 games reason for dq?
Re: Re: June 2010 Partner Gamerscore Competition Sign Up
05/27/10 8:55 pm | #96
Quote by mikemnsn:
If that's the logic then is Avatar and the 2k6 games reason for dq?
Exactly, gamerscore is gamerscore. Stupid to ban a game that includes a glitch...
I wholeheartedly disagree.
Re: June 2010 Partner Gamerscore Competition Sign Up
05/27/10 9:59 pm | #98
way to triple post. and isn't this coming from the guy who created a new account so he could get 18,000 AP to win the competition? you making achievement rules seems hypocritical.
Re: Re: June 2010 Partner Gamerscore Competition Sign Up
05/27/10 10:03 pm | #99
Quote by The Snapple Cap:
way to triple post. and isn't this coming from the guy who created a new account so he could get 18,000 AP to win the competition? you making achievement rules seems hypocritical.
He's just mad because he can't get a copy of the game...
And he's OBVIOUSLY never played Avatar... 20 minutes? Maybe for a mentally challenged chimp.
Re: June 2010 Partner Gamerscore Competition Sign Up
05/27/10 10:12 pm | #100
why is he allowed to make rules when he's in the competition? seems like it only helps him especially since everyone objected to PC games. you said gamerscore competition, you can't exclude things besides gamesaving because that's obviously wrong. because their is a exploit in a game every team has the possibility to get it thus, it doesn't hurt ANYONE since there's potential for everyone and not just the select few.
tl; dr stop being a little a bitch, because you've already changed the rules once. don't try it again.
tl; dr stop being a little a bitch, because you've already changed the rules once. don't try it again.
Re: June 2010 Partner Gamerscore Competition Sign Up
05/27/10 10:15 pm | #101
Okay just stop. Its his competition if you don't like it you can leave.
Puck - when you change the rules midstream like this I doubt you will get anyone on staff to make this an "official" competition.
Puck - when you change the rules midstream like this I doubt you will get anyone on staff to make this an "official" competition.
Re: Re: June 2010 Partner Gamerscore Competition Sign Up
05/27/10 10:19 pm | #102
Quote by Minioger:
Okay just stop. Its his competition if you don't like it you can leave.
Puck - when you change the rules midstream like this I doubt you will get anyone on staff to make this an "official" competition.
Puck - when you change the rules midstream like this I doubt you will get anyone on staff to make this an "official" competition.
Yeah the rules have to be set in stone before you have anyone register to participate. Even though I would think that the Fallout 3 glitch thing is a little unfair. But I don't know much about that. As of right now I would think anything goes.
Re: June 2010 Partner Gamerscore Competition Sign Up
05/28/10 11:39 am | #104
Hmm I guess I never got added
(Page 7 out of 13): « First, … 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, … Last »